Below The Beltway

I believe in the free speech that liberals used to believe in, the economic freedom that conservatives used to believe in, and the personal freedom that America used to believe in.

Imposing A Religious Test

by @ 7:09 am on September 15, 2005. Filed under John Roberts, Supreme Court

In today’s Opinion Journal, Manuel Miranda recounts disturbing but not surprising developments at the Roberts confirmation hearings.

While questioning John Roberts on Tuesday, Judiciary Committee chairman Arlen Specter asked: “Would you say that your views are the same as those expressed by John Kennedy when he was a candidate, and he spoke to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association in September of 1960: ‘I do not speak for my church on public matters, and the church does not speak for me.’

Hours later, Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California made it worse: “In 1960, there was much debate about President John F. Kennedy’s faith and what role Catholicism would play in his administration. At that time, he pledged to address the issues of conscience out of a focus on the national interests, not out of adherence to the dictates of one’s religion. . . . My question is: Do you?”

How insulting. How offensive. How invidiously ignorant to question someone like Judge Roberts with such apparent presumption and disdain for the religion he practices. The JFK question is not just the camel’s nose of religious intolerance; it is the whole smelly camel.

Insulting and offensive, yes. But, unfortunately, not surprising. The anti-Catholic bigotry of some people opposed to Judge Roberts’ nomination has been apparent for some time now. You wouldn’t see this question asked of someone who was Jewish, or black, but being Catholic is apparently one of the few things left that can subject you to special scrutiny in the eyes of the left.

Roberts will be confirmed, but the signs for the future are not encouraging.

John Roberts will be only the 11th Catholic (out of 109 justices) to serve on the Supreme Court in its 215-year history. But his confirmation may be a historic first. It marks the introduction, on the record, of a constitutionally prohibited religious test for a Supreme Court nominee. We are going in the wrong direction.

Previous Posts:

Catholics Need Not Apply
Catholics Need Not Apply Part II

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Comments are closed.

[Below The Beltway is proudly powered by WordPress.]