Comments on: Supreme Court Approves No-Knock Warrants http://belowthebeltway.com/2006/06/15/supreme-court-approves-no-knock-warrants/ I believe in the free speech that liberals used to believe in, the economic freedom that conservatives used to believe in, and the personal freedom that America used to believe in. Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:41:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: A Stitch in Haste http://belowthebeltway.com/2006/06/15/supreme-court-approves-no-knock-warrants/comment-page-1/#comment-474 A Stitch in Haste Thu, 15 Jun 2006 18:28:29 +0000 http://belowthebeltway.com/2006/06/15/supreme-court-approves-no-knock-warrants/#comment-474 <strong>Knock-and-Announce Case Not a Libertarian Outrage</strong> I have very little to say about the Supreme Court's ruling in Hudson v. Booker, 04-1360 (PDF - 51 pages) -- narrowly holding that the exclusionary rule is not an absolute and... Knock-and-Announce Case Not a Libertarian Outrage

I have very little to say about the Supreme Court’s ruling in Hudson v. Booker, 04-1360 (PDF – 51 pages) — narrowly holding that the exclusionary rule is not an absolute and…

]]> By: KipEsquire http://belowthebeltway.com/2006/06/15/supreme-court-approves-no-knock-warrants/comment-page-1/#comment-473 KipEsquire Thu, 15 Jun 2006 16:39:40 +0000 http://belowthebeltway.com/2006/06/15/supreme-court-approves-no-knock-warrants/#comment-473 Let's also keep in mind that the warrant was for a weapon as well as narcotics. This was an extremely dangerous incident for the police. I challenge anyone to argue with a straight face that there is, or should be, a Fourth Amendment right to "lock and load." Let’s also keep in mind that the warrant was for a weapon as well as narcotics. This was an extremely dangerous incident for the police.

I challenge anyone to argue with a straight face that there is, or should be, a Fourth Amendment right to “lock and load.”

]]>