Below The Beltway

I believe in the free speech that liberals used to believe in, the economic freedom that conservatives used to believe in, and the personal freedom that America used to believe in.

Deja Vu, All Over Again

by @ 7:29 am on August 2, 2006. Filed under War On Terror

Captain Ed links to this essay by Michael Ledeen, who looks at the worlds current situation and sees parallels to the years prior to the Second World War:

I always have my doubts about ?trends.? The history of 20th-century America is largely about a country that never prepared for war, and was always compelled ? by our enemies ? to conduct enormous crusades. It was seemingly all or nothing for us. The history of America in war, like that of most others, is largely about making enormous blunders at the beginning, and then sorting it out. Our great strength is not so much avoiding error, but the ability to recover quickly, change tactics and even strategy, and get it done. I think that applies to the three world wars in the last century.

The scary thing about our current jam is that 9/11 was supposed to have been the wakeup call, but we are again asleep. For this I blame our leaders ? both the administration and the Dems. The administration is constitutionally unable to explain itself, and the Dems have no qualms about losing all present battles so long as they can elect their candidates and bring down this president.

The greatest failure of our leaders, with rare exceptions, is their refusal to see the war plain, which means Iran and Syria (might as well call them ?Syran,? since they operate in tandem, with Tehran pushing most of the buttons). It was never possible to ?win in Iraq? so long as we insisted on fighting in Iraq alone. You can not win a regional war by playing defense in one country. It was, and remains, a sucker?s game. Syran pays no price at all for killing our kids and our allies in Iraq and Afghanistan, and now in Gaza and Lebanon/Israel.

Captain Ed expands on Ledeen’s thoughts and asks an important question:

When we entered the war on terror, we knew where the loci of state support existed: Damascus, Teheran, Baghdad, and Kabul. We have managed to do something about the latter two, but we seem curiously unwilling to finish the job. We do not need to declare war on Syria and Iran to beat them, and in Iran’s case at least, war would definitely be detrimental to the cause. However, we need to work fast and hard to topple the terrorist-sponsoring regimes, not coddle and reward them by having them dictate the peace in the Middle East. We know what their idea of peace means — so why do we endorse it?

An excellent question. September 11th was supposed to have been the Pearl Harbor of the War On Terror, the event woke Americans up from our slumber and got us into the fight. But, as time has gone on, the will to fight has waned. Is it going to take something worse than 9/11 to finally wake us up ? I hope not.

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Comments are closed.

[Below The Beltway is proudly powered by WordPress.]