Below The Beltway

I believe in the free speech that liberals used to believe in, the economic freedom that conservatives used to believe in, and the personal freedom that America used to believe in.

Stupidity Squared

by @ 9:55 am on December 29, 2006. Filed under Evolution vs. ID, Science

It seems the U.S. Park Service is being told not to offend creationists who visit the Grand Canyon:

Washington, DC ? Grand Canyon National Park is not permitted to give an official estimate of the geologic age of its principal feature, due to pressure from Bush administration appointees. Despite promising a prompt review of its approval for a book claiming the Grand Canyon was created by Noah’s flood rather than by geologic forces, more than three years later no review has ever been done and the book remains on sale at the park, according to documents released today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).

?In order to avoid offending religious fundamentalists, our National Park Service is under orders to suspend its belief in geology,? stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch. ?It is disconcerting that the official position of a national park as to the geologic age of the Grand Canyon is ?no comment.??

And, as if that weren’t bad enough, the Park Service is allowing a book claiming that the Grand Canyon was formed by the same flood that brought us the story of Noah, despite all of the scientific evidence to the contrary:

In August 2003, Park Superintendent Joe Alston attempted to block the sale at park bookstores of Grand Canyon: A Different View by Tom Vail, a book claiming the Canyon developed on a biblical rather than an evolutionary time scale. NPS Headquarters, however, intervened and overruled Alston. To quiet the resulting furor, NPS Chief of Communications David Barna told reporters and members of Congress that there would be a high-level policy review of the issue.

According to a recent NPS response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed by PEER, no such review was ever requested, let alone conducted or completed.

Park officials have defended the decision to approve the sale of Grand Canyon: A Different View, claiming that park bookstores are like libraries, where the broadest range of views are displayed. In fact, however, both law and park policies make it clear that the park bookstores are more like schoolrooms rather than libraries. As such, materials are only to reflect the highest quality science and are supposed to closely support approved interpretive themes. Moreover, unlike a library the approval process is very selective. Records released to PEER show that during 2003, Grand Canyon officials rejected 22 books and other products for bookstore placement while approving only one new sale item ? the creationist book.

Ignorance — now officially endorsed by the Federal Government.

H/T: Dvorak Uncensored

5 Responses to “Stupidity Squared”

  1. zen says:

    This is sad, but a thought I had about the latest push(es) by the Bush admin to insert creationism into the public square….After Bush is out and a more sensible acceptance of real science returns, the manufactured “war on Christianity” will have it’s necessary fodder. Great.

  2. CR UVa says:

    Science cannot prove or disprove God. While it does get old hearing about this group or that getting offended, how pointless is a book that suggests a process that is millions of years old for someone who doesn’t buy it? I studied astronomy in college, but I certainly was not taking it all at face value.

    Expecting people (billions for that matter) to just give up faith and run to science is a pipe dream. Science is not the answer to everything, nor is it the key to intelligence. Ignorance can be just as easily acheived by taking all the science spoon fed to you and not looking at it with a more critical eye.

  3. CR UVa,

    The author of that book has every right to his theories, as wrong-headed and illogical as they might be, what I have a problem with is the Park Service being required to sell his pseudo-science in their bookstore.

  4. CR UVa says:

    Sort of like how they are also required to sell the so-called “science” of how the Grand Canyon formed? Remember that when a parent complains of how the inconsistent and poorly formed theory of evolution is taught in schools; it is the exact same thing.

  5. So, please tell me, do you honestly dispute the thousands of volumes of geological evidence about the origins and age of the Grand Canyon ?

    And, if so, what evidence do you cite to counter it ?

[Below The Beltway is proudly powered by WordPress.]