CNN held the Democratic version of the much vaunted YouTube debate last night:
CHARLESTON, S.C., July 23 — Democratic presidential candidates shared the spotlight Monday night with ordinary citizens from around the country in a two-hour debate that featured sharp and sometimes witty video questions and often equally sharp exchanges among the candidates on issues ranging from Iraq and health care to whether any of them can fix a broken political system.
The debate, co-sponsored by CNN and YouTube, underscored the arrival of the Internet as a force in politics. The citizen-interrogators generated the most diverse set of questions in any of the presidential debates to date and challenged the candidates to break out of the rhetoric of their campaign speeches and to address sometimes uncomfortable issues, such as race, gender, religion and their own vulnerabilities.
Many questions in the nationally televised session were aimed at the two leading candidates, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) and Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.), and they used the forum to challenge each other more directly than they have in past debates. But all candidates were put on the spot at one time or another, such as when asked whether, if elected president, they would work for the minimum wage. Most said they would.
Once again, I didn’t watch the debate as I had far more important things to do yesterday evening. Fortunately, Vodkapundit’s Steve Green stepped in once again, martini glass in hand, and liveblogged the debate the only way you can at this stage of the election process, with copious amounts of alcohol.
6:41pm At last, another commercial break. My impression thus far is twofold. 1) YouTube is the future (for now) of presidential debates. 2) I really really really really really really love my martinis. I mean, most people do this sober.
Heh.
Earlier in the day, Steve submitted his own YouTube questions, apparently none of which were used. See here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.
