He was speaking in Des Moines, and, well, see for yourself:
Sioux City, Ia. - God’s will is for Iowa to have the first-in-the-nation caucus, Democratic presidential candidate Bill Richardson told a crowd here Monday.
“Iowa, for good reason, for constitutional reasons, for reasons related to the Lord, should be the first caucus and primary,” Richardson, New Mexico’s governor, said at the Northwest Iowa Labor Council Picnic. “And I want you to know who was the first candidate to sign a pledge not to campaign anywhere if they got ahead of Iowa. It was Bill Richardson.”
Somehow I don’t think the creator of the universe cares when Iowa holds its caucus.
September 5th, 2007 at 11:14 am
Please read Bill Richardson’s recently published article on how we must reconfigure the entire US Foreign Policy,printed in the Harvard International Review, yet has hardly been noticed by any mainstream media.
You could conclude that Bill Richardson is changing the nature of the debate between the Democrat candidates and improving the international focus of their dialogue, not to mention being the strongest candidate to speak for ending the Iraq war immediately.
I hope you can share this important document with your friends, colleagues, and readers. It is a very important international policy breakthrough and deserves to be read and considered by every single American, the diplomatic community from every nation, as well as your insightful readers! I am not officially connected to his campaign, but as a private citizen, I do recognize the importance of this statement enough to send it to you.
Thank you, Stephen Fox
___________________________________
New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson’s International Policies, from Harvard International Review
“New Realism: Crafting a US Foreign Policy for a New Century”
Governor Bill Richardson
Redacted from the Harvard International Review
US foreign policymakers face novel challenges in the 21st century. Jihadists and environmental crises have replaced armies and missiles as the greatest threats; globalization has eroded the significance of national borders. Many
problems that were once national are now global, and dangers that once came only from states now come also from societies—not from hostile governments, but from hostile individuals or from impersonal social trends, such as the consumption of fossil fuels. The piece does a credible job of laying out the problems before us and arguing that Bush has not taken the appropriate measures to deal with them.
The highlights of Richardson’s plans:
First and foremost, the United States must repair its alliances. US leaders also must restore commitment to international law and multilateral cooperation.
Promoting expansion of the UN Security Council’s permanent membership to include Japan, India, Germany, and one country each from Africa and Latin America.
Ethical reform at the United Nations so that this vital institution can help its many underdeveloped and destitute member states meet the challenges of the 21st century.
Expanding the G8 to include India and China.
The US government must join the International Criminal Court and respect all international treaties, including the Geneva Conventions.”
On environmental issues, the United States must be the leader, not the laggard, in global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by embracing the Kyoto Protocol on global warming, Lead the world with a man-on-the-moon effort to improve energy efficiency and to commercialize clean, alternative technologies.
Stop considering diplomatic engagement with others as a reward for good behavior.
Various efforts including ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty
The United States needs to start showing, both through its words and through its actions, that this is not, as the Jihadists claim, a clash of civilizations. Rather, it is a clash between civilization and barbarity.
Closing Guantanamo
The United States also needs to pressure Egypt, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and other friends in the Arab world to reform their education systems, which are incubators of anti-US sentiment.
Spend more to develop first responders and to drastically improve public health facilities, which, five years after 9/11, are not ready for a biological attack.
The United States needs to lead the global fight against poverty, which is the basis of so much violence.
Encourage rich countries to honor UN Millennium goal commitments.
Lead donors on debt relief, shifting aid from loans to grants, and focus on primary health care and affordable vaccines.
Promote trade agreements, which create more jobs in all nations and which seriously address wage disparities, worker rights, and the environment.
Pressure pharmaceutical companies to allow expanded use of generic drugs, and encourage public-private partnerships to reduce costs and enhance access to anti-malarial drugs and bed nets.
Promote a multilateral Marshall Plan for the Middle East and North Africa.
_____________________________________
I look forward to your reply,
Stephen Fox
stephen@santafefineart.com
September 6th, 2007 at 7:54 pm
Thank you for finding and printing this great article. Richardson is clearly the best candidate! He has the best resume, the best qualifications, and he just makes good sense in this messed up time. So his sense of humor may be off for some folk - is that any reason to keep our troops in Iraq any longer than absolutely necessary? Or any reason to allow the money (which is behind the media) decide who we vote for? If he doesn’t become the next president I will be convinced this nation is brainwashed on some kind of chemical. I’ve quietly suspected it since 2004. If, as Stephen says, Bill Richardson is changing the nature of the debate between the Democrat candidates and improving the international focus of their dialogue…” then we, the critical thinkers - voters, need to change the nature of the relationship between the voter and electoral process and system. Let’s start by insisting that the mainstream media give this guy the coverage he deserves.