Below The Beltway

I believe in the free speech that liberals used to believe in, the economic freedom that conservatives used to believe in, and the personal freedom that America used to believe in.

[powered by WordPress.]

Democratic Debate Reaction Round-Up

by @ 7:07 am on February 27, 2008.

With a few exceptions, the consensus this morning seems to be that, while Hillary Clinton may have scored a few points and Obama was forced to answer questions he hasn’t had to deal with before, last night’s debate really hasn’t changed a thing.

As Stephen Green noted, a good deal of debate consisted of leftist policy wonking, most of very, very distressing:

The debate opened with 16 minutes of discussion over whose mandatory health care plan was the most mandatory, and whose was slightly less intrusive. That part of the debate went on so long, in fact, that moderator Brian Williams even joked about it near the end. And what did we learn? That Clinton cares very deeply whether or not anyone, anywhere, might somehow be able to escape the clutches of HillaryCare. We also learned that Obama cares only very slightly less.

On NAFTA the candidates are agreed: Free trade sucks. Although Obama was quick enough to provide a little shout-out to American workers’ productivity, a smart move in blue-collar Ohio. In fact, that line could be seen as poaching on yet another of Clinton’s core constituencies. It could be seen that way because that’s exactly what Obama was doing. Neither candidate would be cornered into threatening to cut off NAFTA inside of six months, but both promised to “reexamine” or “renegotiate” the treaty. The fact that the original agreement took years, not months, to negotiate was left unmentioned. That NAFTA then took a determined President Clinton and a lot of willing Republican Senators to get ratified was left unmentioned, too.

Do these guys really think that pissing off America’s two biggest trading partners is going to help fix the economy ? Apparently, they do. Senator Smoot ? Senator Hawley ?

Marc Ambinder doubts that the debate really changed anything:

I suspect, though, that Clinton’s intemperate complaint about the NBC’s debate reflecting the Saturday Night Live parody will be what the morning shows dissect and dissect, and beyond that, there was really nothing else to commend to the new viewer. Ohioans concerned about NAFTA learned that Clinton changed her mind about the efficacy of the trade agreement and about her promise to threaten to pull out of the treaty unless Canada and Mexico renegotiate its terms; me too, said Obama. The two candidates fought to a draw over mandates; there doesn’t seem to be a truth there one can actually find. Obama had some strong moments, particularly, as usual, on Iraq. His two best lines: how Clinton was responsible for getting the country “into the ditch” that both of them were trying to get out of, and how she was ready from day one to “enable” Bush to take the country to war.

I hesitate to point out her body language, if only because I can easily read too much into it. But she seemed tense, remorseful, sad, at times… her neck seemed leaden; her voice had an edge that all to often crossed the boundary between assertive and plaintive.

Obama seemed more solicitous and upbeat. Even as he was defensive, he was passive-defensive; he was oh-so-cool; one e-mailer, recalling Twain, called him a Christian with four aces. He seemed to be listening to Hillary Stagg with one ear and to Hillary Clinton with the other.

Bottom line: did this, the 20th debate, change much? Probably not.

Ron Chusid agrees that the SNL remark will be the soundbite of the day:

Hillary Clinton had one last chance to try to change the dynamics of the race before the Ohio and Texas primaries. Instead she showed why her campaign has failed in a mixed performance in Tuesday’s debate (transcript here). Gone are the days in which Clinton both led in the polls and dominated the debates. While Obama sometimes got lost in the group debates, he has learned to take charge of the one on one debates while Clinton often looked desperate. Clinton even resorted to playing the victim card as she complained about being asked questions before Obama, trying to compare the situation to a skit on Saturday Night Live in which the reporters fawned over Obama.

That struck me as another line that Clinton was fed and decided to use. It was, in some ways, worse than the Xerox line from last week because she was basically trying to play the victim, complaining that she’s being treated unfairly because, horrors, she’s being forced to answer questions.

Not going to work Hillary.

On the whole, as I said, I don’t think that this debate will change anything significantly. Be prepared for a week-long ground war in Ohio and Texas.

Related Posts

Comments are closed.

[powered by WordPress.]