<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Battle Against The Bailout Continues In The Senate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://belowthebeltway.com/2008/12/11/the-battle-against-the-bailout-continues-in-the-senate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://belowthebeltway.com/2008/12/11/the-battle-against-the-bailout-continues-in-the-senate/</link>
	<description>I believe in the free speech that liberals used to believe in, the economic freedom that conservatives used to believe in, and the personal freedom that America used to believe in.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:02:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leslie Carbone</title>
		<link>http://belowthebeltway.com/2008/12/11/the-battle-against-the-bailout-continues-in-the-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-267738</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Carbone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belowthebeltway.com/?p=12851#comment-267738</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link, Doug.  And you raise a very good point about how deeply, disturbingly unAmerican is such government control of companies.  But I have very mixed thoughts on that aspect of the now-dead Corker plan.  I hate federal control of business, and fear where it would lead.  But on the other hand, I want bail-outs to hurt.  I want them to make the survival of the companies that take them less likely, not more likely (as surely federal control can accomplish).  I want bail-outs to be so painful that the screams of every corporate executive and union boss who takes them will echo through the decades as a warning in the ears of any future moral imbeciles tempted to try to rebuild their failing companies on the backs of hard-working taxpayers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link, Doug.  And you raise a very good point about how deeply, disturbingly unAmerican is such government control of companies.  But I have very mixed thoughts on that aspect of the now-dead Corker plan.  I hate federal control of business, and fear where it would lead.  But on the other hand, I want bail-outs to hurt.  I want them to make the survival of the companies that take them less likely, not more likely (as surely federal control can accomplish).  I want bail-outs to be so painful that the screams of every corporate executive and union boss who takes them will echo through the decades as a warning in the ears of any future moral imbeciles tempted to try to rebuild their failing companies on the backs of hard-working taxpayers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auto Bailout Dead, Politics Alive and Well</title>
		<link>http://belowthebeltway.com/2008/12/11/the-battle-against-the-bailout-continues-in-the-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-267733</link>
		<dc:creator>Auto Bailout Dead, Politics Alive and Well</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belowthebeltway.com/?p=12851#comment-267733</guid>
		<description>[...] Doug Mataconis offers disdain for both sides, observing, &#8220;Not only is the Corker plan a bailout, it’s also an even greater imposition of state corporatism than anything we’ve ever seen before. It would give the Federal Government, represented by a self-described &#8216;car czar&#8217; unprecedented control over a huge segment of the American economy, and anyone who thinks that power will be surrendered easily is kidding themselves.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Doug Mataconis offers disdain for both sides, observing, &#8220;Not only is the Corker plan a bailout, it’s also an even greater imposition of state corporatism than anything we’ve ever seen before. It would give the Federal Government, represented by a self-described &#8216;car czar&#8217; unprecedented control over a huge segment of the American economy, and anyone who thinks that power will be surrendered easily is kidding themselves.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
