Below The Beltway

I believe in the free speech that liberals used to believe in, the economic freedom that conservatives used to believe in, and the personal freedom that America used to believe in.

Baltimore Prosecutors Give Plea Deal To Crazy Witness

by @ 9:15 am on March 31, 2009. Filed under Dumbasses, Legal

I wouldn’t ordinarily post about a story like this, but its just too bizarre to pass up:

Accepting a plea bargain that her attorney described as unprecedented in American jurisprudence, a 22-year-old Maryland woman yesterday agreed to cooperate in the prosecution of other defendants in the death of her son under the condition that charges against her be dropped if the child rises from the dead.

“It also is specifically noted,” Baltimore Circuit Court Judge Timothy Doory said in court as he described the plea bargain to the boy’s mother, “that if the victim in this case, Javon Thompson, is resurrected, as you still hold some hope he will be, you may withdraw the plea, and the charges will be nolle prossed [withdrawn] against you.”

The boy’s mother, Ria Ramkissoon, is shaping up as prosecutors’ star witness against a 40-year-old Baltimore woman named Queen Antoinette. Prosecutors allege that Queen Antoinette led a small cult, called One Mind Ministries, based in a West Baltimore rowhouse. In early 2007, prosecutors say, Queen Antoinette instructed Ramkissoon and others to deprive Javon of food and water because he didn’t say “amen” before breakfast.

Queen Antoinette has been charged with first-degree murder and child abuse resulting in death, as have three of her alleged followers. Any trial is expected to be at least two months away

Now you’ve got to hand it to the prosecutors, they’ve gotten a guilty plea, a witness, and no chance that she’ll ever actually be able to withdraw the plea.

But, as an attorney, I’ve got to wonder — just how stable a witness can she be if she honestly believes that her son will rise from the dead ?

5 Responses to “Baltimore Prosecutors Give Plea Deal To Crazy Witness”

  1. The attorney should have refused the deal…or resigned if the defendant refused to listen to the attorney…and the judge shouldn’t have accepted it either!

    I’m lost for words.


  2. James Young says:

    Perhaps she has inside information on the impending Rapture?

  3. James Young says:

    What was the Einstein quotation mentioned by a guy the other day? “Genius has its limits; stupid doesn’t.”

  4. Timothy,

    I’m also a bit confused on how the judge would let this one fly.

    I’m not sure if she was represented by counsel, though.

  5. The first line says “her attorney”, I presume that means the mother’s attorney.

    And if they’re in Circuit Court she should be represented by counsel.

[Below The Beltway is proudly powered by WordPress.]