Below The Beltway

I believe in the free speech that liberals used to believe in, the economic freedom that conservatives used to believe in, and the personal freedom that America used to believe in.

Did Sarah Palin Cost John McCain The Election ?

by @ 6:57 am on August 19, 2009. Filed under 2008 Election, John McCain, Politics, Sarah Palin

According to this review of the 2008 Election results and the polls, there’s at least some evidence that the answer appears to be yes:

John McCain’s August 29 announcement of Palin as his running mate surprised the Republican establishment, the media, and especially voters. She made a strong first impression: she enjoyed high approval ratings after her acceptance speech, and the percentage of voters saying that they intended to vote Republican skyrocketed. But within days of the speech, her ratings began a precipitous slide from which she—and the McCain campaign—never recovered. Throughout the rest of the campaign, vote intentions were closely tied to Palin’s approval ratings: each major Palin approval drop was followed, within a day or two, by a drop in McCain vote intention. No other factor moved McCain support with such precision. Comparison of the correlation between running mate approval ratings and vote intentions from 2000 and 2004 confirms Palin’s peculiar importance in 2008.

As for why Palin may have done what no Vice-Presidential running mate has done before — decide an election — the authors point to two factors:

First, John McCain’s age and medical history may have played a role, as there was a reasonably high probability of Palin becoming President before 2012. Second, borrowing powerful themes from Hillary Clinton’s primary campaign, McCain sought to emphasize Obama’s lack of executive experience, but by choosing Palin, he may have undermined that argument at a stroke. Is emphasizing Palin’s role in the unraveling of McCain’s post-convention advantage the same as saying she cost him the election?

That’s not saying that McCain would’ve won if he’d selected someone other than Palin, of course. That’s something we’ll never be able to know. What the polls do seem to show, though, is that the Palin selection, while it did provide a much-needed boost to the McCain campaign in the early days of September 2008, ultimately did far more harm than good.

H/T: Peter Suderman

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

2 Responses to “Did Sarah Palin Cost John McCain The Election ?”

  1. Matt says:

    John McCain lost the election because he ran his campaign backwards. You run a campaign by first building up your base support (on the right or the left). Then towards the end of the campaign and with your VP pick you try to appeal to the independents who actually decide the election.

    McCain was already a moderate, many republicans already called him a RINO, and he spent his campaign wooing the independents (and democrats) and then picked a conservative VP to try to gain the votes of the base who didn’t like him and liked him even less after his left swinging campaign.

  2. The only part of your hypothesis that doesn’t ring true to me is the last part.

    If picking Palin accomplished one thing, it rallied the conservative base to his side. Of course, it pissed off pretty much everyone else.

    I agree that McCain would’ve lost no matter who he picked, but there seems to be a pretty clear correlation between Palin’s unpopularity and the decline in McCain’s poll numbers from the RNC Convention through Election Day

[Below The Beltway is proudly powered by WordPress.]