Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey was probably surprised at the reception she got at a recent town hall:
I believe in the free speech that liberals used to believe in, the economic freedom that conservatives used to believe in, and the personal freedom that America used to believe in.
[Below The Beltway is proudly powered by WordPress.]
Lynn is out of touch.
Good video. The government is in the business NOT to help people to compete and have free choices and market but protecting status quo and manipulation.
She torqued quite a few people by announcing before the town hall meeting that she was not going to attempt to change anyone’s mind on the issue but that she wanted to hear people’s opinions. I had a couple of family members at the meeting. They were seated in one of the overflow rooms where there was audio from the main room, but no video. It was quite contentious, and evenly split between pro/con positions. Overall, they said, she dodged many questions, such as, “Have you read the bill?”
Lynn is bat-shit crazy. But hey — it’s Petaluma.
Er, have you watched the clip? They cheer her when she announces her stance, not boo. I am against single-payer, but the people at this town hall are for it, I’m guessing. You need to find a better title for this clip.
Something I’ve never understood:
If single-payer universal healthcare systems are so great, why aren’t the states doing it already? Absolutely nothing prevents California from setting up a universal healthcare system on its own.
Unless it’s those huge budget deficits due to ballooning, mismanaged government programs… Hmm…
Thanks for sharing this video. The woman business owner seemed to own that crowd – and her point is very well taken. Some very simple changes (maybe one sheet of a bill) could really serve us better than the 1300 page nightmare out there now.
I bet that was an ugly surprise. Modern American politicians are not accustomed to being booed like that.
Of the people cheering when Woolsey, prim, imperious and tight-lipped, said she supports a single-payer healthcare system (govt monopoly), I would bet that not one of them has ever created a job for another person. Perspectives change when you’re a job creator/producer than when you are a job recipient.
It will mean nothing, the brain dead will continue to support the Obama power grab and this awful bill.
KennedyCare!
What could go wrong?
Cover the uinsured… By having government cover the eight percent who are not by taking over the whole health-care business (no, not just “insurance” – everything) of the full one hundred percent.
Except, well, who are the uninsured? And are they really unable to get help? Well, a lot are healthy youngsters who (as is normal) do not think they need it, some are between jobs and COBRA or what-have-you means paying the ninety percent your employer used to as well as the ten percent you did ["benefits" like that are not part of your unemployment check...], quite a few are children, and the rest are simply unable for one reason or another to handle paying. Do they risk bleeding to death in the street because n doctor will treat them? Uh, no.
Example of that inability-to-pay. For two years I was in a shelter for the homeless. None of us had health insurance. All of us had access to doctors, treatments, etc. And yes, because “government” – i.e. tax-paying citizens – paid. Once I got through the SocSec maze I enteerd MediCare – again, paid with “other people’s” money.
Does that mean I support this takeover? NO! Cetainly not one that looks like the British or Canadian systems: possibly one that looks like other European systems, though I doubt it… Yes, there are problems, and some are fixable or at least improvable. But I am not about to trade in our stretch limo health care for a rickshaw simply because there is a smear of mustard on the armrest of the driver’s door.
She came there with her mind made up and she will not change it no matter what the people say. She is just another ignorant, arrogant Democrat who takes their orders from old stretched face.