<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Open To Bailing Out Newspapers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/09/21/obama-open-to-bailing-out-newspapers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/09/21/obama-open-to-bailing-out-newspapers/</link>
	<description>I believe in the free speech that liberals used to believe in, the economic freedom that conservatives used to believe in, and the personal freedom that America used to believe in.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:13:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chodeo</title>
		<link>http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/09/21/obama-open-to-bailing-out-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-344916</link>
		<dc:creator>Chodeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belowthebeltway.com/?p=20362#comment-344916</guid>
		<description>Where, from that interview with Obama, can you possibly get the idea that he favors bailing out the newspaper industry?  And where do you get the idea that Obama will bailout any industry?  Have you forgotten that it was George W. Bush who signed the most egregious of bailouts, TARP, into law?  And that it was also championed at the time by John McCain, who &quot;suspended his campaign&quot; so that he could whip votes for the bill?  

It&#039;s funny, you&#039;ve laid out this defense of the blogosphere, noting that it isn&#039;t just a cauldron for fear mongering and untruth, in order to support an entirely misleading and untruthful premise.  Irony anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where, from that interview with Obama, can you possibly get the idea that he favors bailing out the newspaper industry?  And where do you get the idea that Obama will bailout any industry?  Have you forgotten that it was George W. Bush who signed the most egregious of bailouts, TARP, into law?  And that it was also championed at the time by John McCain, who &#8220;suspended his campaign&#8221; so that he could whip votes for the bill?  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny, you&#8217;ve laid out this defense of the blogosphere, noting that it isn&#8217;t just a cauldron for fear mongering and untruth, in order to support an entirely misleading and untruthful premise.  Irony anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimbo</title>
		<link>http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/09/21/obama-open-to-bailing-out-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-344819</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belowthebeltway.com/?p=20362#comment-344819</guid>
		<description>Speaking of fact checking and Dan Rather...
http://www.employeerightspost.com/2009/07/articles/fraud/dan-rather-wins-round-in-fraud-case-against-cbs/

It&#039;s not over yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of fact checking and Dan Rather&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.employeerightspost.com/2009/07/articles/fraud/dan-rather-wins-round-in-fraud-case-against-cbs/" rel="nofollow">http://www.employeerightspost.com/2009/07/articles/fraud/dan-rather-wins-round-in-fraud-case-against-cbs/</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not over yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Below The Beltway » Blog Archive » Obama Open To Bailing Out &#8230; &#124; kozmom news</title>
		<link>http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/09/21/obama-open-to-bailing-out-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-344777</link>
		<dc:creator>Below The Beltway » Blog Archive » Obama Open To Bailing Out &#8230; &#124; kozmom news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belowthebeltway.com/?p=20362#comment-344777</guid>
		<description>[...] more here: Below The Beltway » Blog Archive » Obama Open To Bailing Out &#8230;     google_ad_client = &quot;pub-3658190228035086&quot;; google_ad_slot = &quot;1112917537&quot;; google_ad_width = [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more here: Below The Beltway » Blog Archive » Obama Open To Bailing Out &#8230;     google_ad_client = &#8220;pub-3658190228035086&#8243;; google_ad_slot = &#8220;1112917537&#8243;; google_ad_width = [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vast</title>
		<link>http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/09/21/obama-open-to-bailing-out-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-344727</link>
		<dc:creator>Vast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belowthebeltway.com/?p=20362#comment-344727</guid>
		<description>&quot;I am concerned that if the direction of the news is all blogosphere, all opinions, with no serious fact-checking, no serious attempts to put stories in context, that what you will end up getting is people shouting at each other across the void but not a lot of mutual understanding&quot;

While I somewhat agree with this statement, I don&#039;t believe that print or even televised news media have a lock on the market for fact-checking. Bailing out print is a bad idea as you point out Doug, because it would be like trying to bailout Betamax tapes.  Newspapers are old news, especially when it comes to national and international level coverage. Newspapers will continue to however have a market in smaller local areas, at least for now. The current troubles of the newspaper industry have little to nothing to do with the economic crisis of the last year and have everything to do with being obsolete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I am concerned that if the direction of the news is all blogosphere, all opinions, with no serious fact-checking, no serious attempts to put stories in context, that what you will end up getting is people shouting at each other across the void but not a lot of mutual understanding&#8221;</p>
<p>While I somewhat agree with this statement, I don&#8217;t believe that print or even televised news media have a lock on the market for fact-checking. Bailing out print is a bad idea as you point out Doug, because it would be like trying to bailout Betamax tapes.  Newspapers are old news, especially when it comes to national and international level coverage. Newspapers will continue to however have a market in smaller local areas, at least for now. The current troubles of the newspaper industry have little to nothing to do with the economic crisis of the last year and have everything to do with being obsolete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Posts about Barack Obama as of September 21, 2009 &#187; The Daily Parr</title>
		<link>http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/09/21/obama-open-to-bailing-out-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-344691</link>
		<dc:creator>Posts about Barack Obama as of September 21, 2009 &#187; The Daily Parr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belowthebeltway.com/?p=20362#comment-344691</guid>
		<description>[...] Bank of Boston get a meeting with Treasury officials to negotiate a $12 million bailout.   Obama Open To Bailing Out Newspapers &#8211; belowthebeltway.com 09/21/2009 Is there any industry that Barack Obama won’t bail out of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bank of Boston get a meeting with Treasury officials to negotiate a $12 million bailout.   Obama Open To Bailing Out Newspapers &#8211; belowthebeltway.com 09/21/2009 Is there any industry that Barack Obama won’t bail out of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
