Below The Beltway

I believe in the free speech that liberals used to believe in, the economic freedom that conservatives used to believe in, and the personal freedom that America used to believe in.

[powered by WordPress.]

Supreme Court Declines To Accept Case Challenging Florida Pledge Of Allegiance Law

by @ 4:16 pm on October 5, 2009.

The Supreme Court has declined to review a case challenging a law requiring students to recite the Pledge of Allegiance:

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal to review a Florida law that requires public school students to recite the Pledge of Allegiance each day unless they have their parents’ written permission excusing them.

The justices declined Monday an appeal filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida on behalf of a high school student removed from his math class because he remained seated during the pledge.

A federal appeals court upheld most of the law. The ACLU said that ruling, if left undisturbed, would undermine the Supreme Court’s 1943 ruling that schoolchildren could not be forced to salute the flag and say the pledge.

That case, of course, West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette in which the Court said:

Whether the First Amendment to the Constitution will permit officials to order observance of ritual of this nature does not depend upon whether as a voluntary exercise we would think it to be good, bad or merely innocuous. Any credo of nationalism is likely to include what some disapprove or to omit what others think essential, and to give off different overtones as it takes on different accents or interpretations. 14 If official power exists to coerce acceptance of any patriotic creed, what it shall contain cannot be decided by courts, but must be largely discretionary with the ordaining authority, whose power to prescribe would no doubt include power to amend. Hence validity of the asserted power to force an American citizen publicly to profess any statement of belief or to engage in any ceremony of assent to one presents questions of power that must be considered independently of any idea we may have as to the utility of the ceremony in question.

(…)

If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. If there are any circumstances which permit an exception, they do not now occur to us. 19

We think the action of the local authorities in compelling the flag salute and pledge transcends constitutional limitations on their power and invades the sphere of intellect and spirit which it is the purpose of the First Amendment to our Constitution to reserve from all official control.

It seems fairly clear, then, that students cannot be compelled to recite the Pledge of Allegiance. The fact that the Florida law allows children to be exempted if their parents request it does not, to me, seem to be a sufficient protection of the minor’s rights under the First Amendment. It’s unfortunate that the Supreme Court refused to hear this case.

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit

4 Responses to “Supreme Court Declines To Accept Case Challenging Florida Pledge Of Allegiance Law”

  1. Vast Says:

    When I joined the Air Force I of course had to recite an oath. It was however stated before I took the oath that if I wanted to leave out any reference to god, that I was free to remain silent during that part.

    I have no issue with the reciting of the Pledge of Allegiance in schools. Hell I had to say it probably up until about 4th or 5th grade. I do however think it should be totally acceptable for kids to skip any references to god if they so choose.

  2. Doug Mataconis Says:

    I have no problem with it either, I just don’t think that it should be mandatory whether or not the phrase “under God” is included.

  3. Christopher Bingham Says:

    There is nothing as un-American as forcing kids to recite a loyalty oath. It’s brainwashing of the lowest sort.

    If America wasn’t a sewer of lies it would be joke. Liberty and Justice for all? Pledging to the FLAG? Not the Constitution, but the FLAG and the “Republic”?

  4. Rob Miles Says:

    I encourage everyone to replace “under God” in the pledge with “under law”, which I consider a more accurate representation of what the US is about. However, even with that, nobody should be compelled to recite any pledge to any body against their will. It’s not only unfortunate that the SC refused to hear the case; it’s practically a dereliction of duty.

[powered by WordPress.]