Below The Beltway

I believe in the free speech that liberals used to believe in, the economic freedom that conservatives used to believe in, and the personal freedom that America used to believe in.

Washington Post: Instead Of Obama, The Nobel Peace Prize Should Go To Neda Of Iran

by @ 11:42 am on October 10, 2009. Filed under Barack Obama, Foreign Affairs, Iran, Politics


The Washington Post Editorial Board joined those skeptical of the decision to give President Obama a Nobel Peace Prize:

IT’S AN ODD Nobel Peace Prize that almost makes you embarrassed for the honoree. In blessing President Obama, the Nobel Committee intended to boost what it called his “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.” A more suitable time for the prize would have been after those efforts had borne some fruit.


The Nobel Committee’s decision is especially puzzling given that a better alternative was readily apparent. This year, hundreds of thousands of ordinary people in Iran braved ferocious official violence to demand their right to vote and to speak freely. Dozens were killed, thousands imprisoned. One of those killed was a young woman named Neda Agha-Soltan; her shooting by thugs working for the Islamist theocracy, captured on video, moved the world. A posthumous award for Neda, as the avatar of a democratic movement in Iran, would have recognized the sacrifices that movement has made and encouraged its struggle in a dark hour. Democracy in Iran would not only set a people free, it would also dramatically improve the chances for world peace, since the regime that murdered her is pursuing nuclear weapons in defiance of the international community.


Announcing Friday that he would accept the award, Mr. Obama graciously offered to share it with “the young woman who marches silently in the streets on behalf of her right to be heard even in the face of beatings and bullets.” But the mere fact that he avoided mentioning either Neda’s name or her country, presumably out of consideration for the Iranian regime with which he is attempting to negotiate, showed the tension that sometimes exists between “diplomacy and cooperation between peoples” on the one hand, and advocacy of human rights on the other. The Nobel Committee could have spared Mr. Obama this dilemma if it had given Neda the award instead of him.

Of course, that would have required a degree of moral courage that the Nobel Committee clearly lacks.

3 Responses to “Washington Post: Instead Of Obama, The Nobel Peace Prize Should Go To Neda Of Iran”

  1. darren kopp says:

    well unfortunately for her, she too has yet to actually achieve any sort of piece, as iran is no different today as it was when she died. so……

  2. One could say the same thing about previous winners like Aung San Suu Kyi and the Dalai Lama.

    Certainly, she is a more appropriate recipient than a man who so far has done nothing

  3. Let's Be Free says:

    No using a name shows consideration for the regime you are negotiating with? Oh yeah, Reagan should have said “Mr. Whathisname, tear down this wall.”

[Below The Beltway is proudly powered by WordPress.]