Below The Beltway

I believe in the free speech that liberals used to believe in, the economic freedom that conservatives used to believe in, and the personal freedom that America used to believe in.

[powered by WordPress.]

Poll: Americans Trust Free Markets Over Government On Health Care

by @ 7:25 pm on October 22, 2009.

According to the latest Rasmussen poll:

Sixty-five percent (65%) of voters nationwide say laws should be changed so that health insurance companies are subject to anti-trust regulations. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that only 12% disagree, while 23% are not sure.

Anti-trust laws are intended to prevent companies and other business entities from working together in ways that limit competition.

Support for putting the health insurance companies under the anti-trust umbrella is consistent with another survey finding: 66% say free market competition between insurance companies will do more than government regulation to reduce health care costs. Just 23% believe more government regulation is the way to reduce costs, and 10% are not sure.

Seventy-three percent (73%) also favor another measure designed to spur free-market competition by allowing people buy health insurance across state lines. Just 20% are opposed to that measure

Well, that’s a good sign.

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit

Related Posts

2 Responses to “Poll: Americans Trust Free Markets Over Government On Health Care”

  1. Neil B ♪ Says:

    Conservatives often claim that it was liberal/anti-market forces wanting to deny insurance coverage across State lines, but really that was obstructed more by the anti-trust exemption and cross-State regulatory issues. (Look that up, I think I’ve got the gist of it.) Reinstating the anti-trust rules, and allowing interstate competition go hand in hand, but the issue of varying State rules is still a problem (perhaps solvable.)

    I think the OP may not appreciate the implications of the idea of allowing the insurance companies to compete more – yes, the public thinks that would help and likely so, but that isn’t inconsistent with a “public option.” The PO ironically is a sort of meta-competition, like having an orange compete against apples that otherwise only compete against each other. I think it’s a good idea since it gives the insurers a non-profit entity to have to benchmark against. I think can survive even then, from having more healthy subscribers who won’t take as many payouts.

    tyrannogenius

  2. Beach Umbrella Says:

    It is about the health care. American’s are believe in the personal freedom.I also agree about that support for putting the health insurance companies under the anti-trust umbrella is consistent with another survey finding….

[powered by WordPress.]