Below The Beltway

I believe in the free speech that liberals used to believe in, the economic freedom that conservatives used to believe in, and the personal freedom that America used to believe in.

U.S. Preparing Containment Strategy For Iran

by @ 1:50 pm on October 28, 2009. Filed under Foreign Affairs, Iran, Middle East

It appears that the West is quickly coming to the realization that preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons is a strategy that probably won’t work:

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is quietly laying the groundwork for long-range strategy that could be used to contain a nuclear-equipped Iran and deter its leaders from using atomic weapons.

U.S. officials insist they are not resigned to a nuclear Iran and are pressing negotiations to prevent it from joining the world’s nuclear club. But at the same time, the administration has set in place the building blocks of policies to contend with an Iran armed with atomic weapons.

Those elements, former officials and analysts said, include the newly revised defense shield for Europe and deeper defense ties to Gulf states that feel threatened by Iran.

Andrew Kuchin, a Russia expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said administration officials are clearly “thinking about” how to contain an Iran armed with nuclear weapons.

“It would be pretty irresponsible on our part if we didn’t,” he said.


The proposed system is based on the assumption that the missiles would be Iranian and carry nuclear warheads.

“So the initial steps are being taken” in that direction, said Kugler said, who says that move is taking the U.S. in the direction of “extended deterrence,” a sort of umbrella over neighbor-nations threatened by a nuclear Iran.

That is akin to a controversial “defense umbrella” concept that Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton mentioned publicly in July. Those comments angered Israel, which said it sounded as if the U.S. was conceding Iran was going nuclear and preparing to live with it.

Clinton insisted her comment was meant to show Iran that it would not profit from building an atomic bomb.

Extended deterrence would be meant to protect friends and allies in the Mideast and Europe from the threat of an Iranian nuclear attack — not unlike the security umbrella the U.S. provided for Germany during the Cold War, when the central threat was seen as either a Soviet land assault or a nuclear attack.

Some question whether such an argument can dissuade Iran, but retired Gen. John Abizaid, who oversaw U.S. military operations in the Mideast from 2003-07, says he thinks that a nuclear-armed Iran would make rational judgments.

“The historical evidence would suggest that Iran is not a suicide state,” he told a University of Virginia conference Oct. 5. “So it’s my military belief that Iran can be deterred.”

We’ll have to hope so.

Comments are closed.

[Below The Beltway is proudly powered by WordPress.]