<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prudish Conservative Goes Nuts Over Breast Self-Exam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/10/30/prudish-conservative-goes-nuts-over-breast-self-exam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/10/30/prudish-conservative-goes-nuts-over-breast-self-exam/</link>
	<description>I believe in the free speech that liberals used to believe in, the economic freedom that conservatives used to believe in, and the personal freedom that America used to believe in.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:31:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Watch Superman Cartoons Online &#187; Below the Beltway » Blog Archive » Prudish Conservative Goes Nuts &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/10/30/prudish-conservative-goes-nuts-over-breast-self-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-363238</link>
		<dc:creator>Watch Superman Cartoons Online &#187; Below the Beltway » Blog Archive » Prudish Conservative Goes Nuts &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belowthebeltway.com/?p=22808#comment-363238</guid>
		<description>[...] MSNBC&#8217;s Dr. Nancy — who&#8217;s show gets terrible ratings — plays the clip of a 28-year-old woman giving herself a breast exam at the beginning of the segment and asks: Was the decision to air this clip a “ploy” for ratings during sweeps week? Ha! &#8230; November 1st, 2009 at 7:26 pm. Elizabeth Edwards as reliable spokeswoman? right… John C. Randolph Says: November 1st, 2009 at 8:38 pm. Of course it&#8217;s a ploy for ratings! So what? I&#8217;ll watch that any day of the week. &#8230;Read More [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MSNBC&#8217;s Dr. Nancy — who&#8217;s show gets terrible ratings — plays the clip of a 28-year-old woman giving herself a breast exam at the beginning of the segment and asks: Was the decision to air this clip a “ploy” for ratings during sweeps week? Ha! &#8230; November 1st, 2009 at 7:26 pm. Elizabeth Edwards as reliable spokeswoman? right… John C. Randolph Says: November 1st, 2009 at 8:38 pm. Of course it&#8217;s a ploy for ratings! So what? I&#8217;ll watch that any day of the week. &#8230;Read More [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard of Oregon</title>
		<link>http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/10/30/prudish-conservative-goes-nuts-over-breast-self-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-357232</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard of Oregon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belowthebeltway.com/?p=22808#comment-357232</guid>
		<description>Does showing this on MSNBC&#039;s Dr Nancy show count as a private showing? I&#039;ve never heard of her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does showing this on MSNBC&#8217;s Dr Nancy show count as a private showing? I&#8217;ve never heard of her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s Cold Out Today, So Here&#8217;s Something To Keep You Warm &#171; The Reluctant Optimist</title>
		<link>http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/10/30/prudish-conservative-goes-nuts-over-breast-self-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-357109</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s Cold Out Today, So Here&#8217;s Something To Keep You Warm &#171; The Reluctant Optimist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belowthebeltway.com/?p=22808#comment-357109</guid>
		<description>[...] Boobies getting squeezed on TV. No, it&#8217;s not the Playboy Channel. It&#8217;s a breast-cancer self-exam awareness thing. That&#8217;s good, but really shouldn&#8217;t they show it on a network that has actual viewers like, say, Fox? Or the Playboy Channel. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Boobies getting squeezed on TV. No, it&#8217;s not the Playboy Channel. It&#8217;s a breast-cancer self-exam awareness thing. That&#8217;s good, but really shouldn&#8217;t they show it on a network that has actual viewers like, say, Fox? Or the Playboy Channel. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/10/30/prudish-conservative-goes-nuts-over-breast-self-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-357041</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belowthebeltway.com/?p=22808#comment-357041</guid>
		<description>That goes quite well with the CNBC show I was watching earlier tonight about the porn industry.  During the show, naturally, they were hawking the DVD with added unaired, uh, bonus material.

Examinations of the business side of the porn industry or breast exams, in of themselves, might not mean much, but I&#039;m smelling desperation in the air.  One more item like this and I think we can officially say NBC News is desperate for ratings (here&#039;s a hint, fellas, ditch the lunatics and do serious news and opinion).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That goes quite well with the CNBC show I was watching earlier tonight about the porn industry.  During the show, naturally, they were hawking the DVD with added unaired, uh, bonus material.</p>
<p>Examinations of the business side of the porn industry or breast exams, in of themselves, might not mean much, but I&#8217;m smelling desperation in the air.  One more item like this and I think we can officially say NBC News is desperate for ratings (here&#8217;s a hint, fellas, ditch the lunatics and do serious news and opinion).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/10/30/prudish-conservative-goes-nuts-over-breast-self-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-357021</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belowthebeltway.com/?p=22808#comment-357021</guid>
		<description>Not the best idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not the best idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C. Randolph</title>
		<link>http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/10/30/prudish-conservative-goes-nuts-over-breast-self-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-356877</link>
		<dc:creator>John C. Randolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belowthebeltway.com/?p=22808#comment-356877</guid>
		<description>Of course it&#039;s a ploy for ratings!  So what?  I&#039;ll watch that any day of the week.

-jcr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it&#8217;s a ploy for ratings!  So what?  I&#8217;ll watch that any day of the week.</p>
<p>-jcr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Kranky</title>
		<link>http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/10/30/prudish-conservative-goes-nuts-over-breast-self-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-356873</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Kranky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belowthebeltway.com/?p=22808#comment-356873</guid>
		<description>Elizabeth Edwards as reliable spokeswoman?  right...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth Edwards as reliable spokeswoman?  right&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/10/30/prudish-conservative-goes-nuts-over-breast-self-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-356867</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belowthebeltway.com/?p=22808#comment-356867</guid>
		<description>1.  A young woman was a poor choice.  Maybe a woman in her 50&#039;s would lead women to the wrong conclusion (about when to give self exams), but a woman in her late 30&#039;s to early 40&#039;s would&#039;ve made more sense.

2.  A smaller breasted woman was a poor choice.  The more tissue in the breast, the more difficult it is to find a tumor.  The example didn&#039;t need to be a surgically augmented porn star but in a country where the average cup size is C (trending toward D due to obesity), using a woman with small mammaries seems to miss the point.

Ratings grab or not, if you&#039;re going to do something controversial, it makes sense to at least do it right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.  A young woman was a poor choice.  Maybe a woman in her 50&#8217;s would lead women to the wrong conclusion (about when to give self exams), but a woman in her late 30&#8217;s to early 40&#8217;s would&#8217;ve made more sense.</p>
<p>2.  A smaller breasted woman was a poor choice.  The more tissue in the breast, the more difficult it is to find a tumor.  The example didn&#8217;t need to be a surgically augmented porn star but in a country where the average cup size is C (trending toward D due to obesity), using a woman with small mammaries seems to miss the point.</p>
<p>Ratings grab or not, if you&#8217;re going to do something controversial, it makes sense to at least do it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: comatus</title>
		<link>http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/10/30/prudish-conservative-goes-nuts-over-breast-self-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-356860</link>
		<dc:creator>comatus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belowthebeltway.com/?p=22808#comment-356860</guid>
		<description>Those were &quot;boobies&quot;? Pah.

MSNBC, the shit-for-tits network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those were &#8220;boobies&#8221;? Pah.</p>
<p>MSNBC, the shit-for-tits network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cbinflux</title>
		<link>http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/10/30/prudish-conservative-goes-nuts-over-breast-self-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-356842</link>
		<dc:creator>cbinflux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belowthebeltway.com/?p=22808#comment-356842</guid>
		<description>This was already done, quite well, by Meredith Baxter Birney. Available at many Net sites.

So, yes, it&#039;s about ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was already done, quite well, by Meredith Baxter Birney. Available at many Net sites.</p>
<p>So, yes, it&#8217;s about ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
