Maybe we will get another date with Orly Taitz in Santa Ana’s Ronald Reagan Federal Building and Courthouse after all. Less than two weeks after Judge David O. Carter dismissed the Laguna Niguel’s Barnett v. Obama lawsuit seeking to throw the President out of office, Taitz has filed a motion for reconsideration of that case.
And boy is it… interesting. Some might call the motion racially and politically offensive, but, whatever. Like any battle for freedom, Orly’s war has its casualties, and common decency is among them.
Basically, Taitz is saying that every single thing that Carter’s ruling said is wrong and factually inaccurate–which is explainable because, Taitz says, the entire opinion was written by a law clerk who is actually an Obama double agent.
Taitz’s minions have seized on the fact that one of Carter’s clerks worked for a multinational law firm that has lawyers who have represented Obama. Ergo, they say, there’s a conspiracy afoot. Does Taitz have any evidence of bias? No. But that doesn’t stop her from putting it in her lawsuit:
Of course, the mere fact that one of Carter’s law clerk’s worked at the same law firm as one of the attorneys who has represented Obama is meaningless. Ethically, it’s not even an issue unless the law clerk worked on the very cases that the judge he’s working for would be hearing. Practically, the fact that the law firm in question, Perkins Coie, has more than 700 lawyers in 15 offices around the world makes it just plain stupid to argue that the fact that the law clerk and one attorney work for the same firm means anything at all on it’s face. Finally, the fact of the matter is that the law clerk worked in a completely different office from the attorney in an area of law that had nothing to do with President Obama or any of Orly’s cases.
Of course, when did facts ever stop the Queen Bee ?
Or, for that matter, common decency:
More charming, though, is Taitz’s ability to tap into current events. She decided to spent a few hundred words talking about how, essentially, Judge Carter was in favor of the Ft. Hood shooting that killed 12 people last week… or that Judge Carter would have done nothing to stop it… or… really, we’re not sure the relevance:
Recent terrorist incident at Fort Hood has given this question paramount importance. This order has advocated blind obedience by the members of the military. If someone were to have common sense, brains and strength of character to challenge allegiance of Nidal Malik Hasan in court, after he made numerous anti-American and antimilitary statements, maybe 12 young boys wouldn’t be 6 feet under today, maybe 12 mothers and 12 fathers wouldn’t had their hearts ripped out of their chests and torn apart.
Yes, that right, Orly is exploiting a tragedy for her own purposes.
The Motion for Reconsideration and supporting declaration, which will, of course, be denied, are embedded below the fold.