Below The Beltway

I believe in the free speech that liberals used to believe in, the economic freedom that conservatives used to believe in, and the personal freedom that America used to believe in.

Orly Taitz And The Great Fox News Protest Of 2009

by @ 2:02 pm on November 11, 2009. Filed under Barack Obama, Obama Derangement Syndrome, Politics

Orly Taitz was sufficiently pissed off at Bill O’Reilly’s dismissal of birthers as “crazy” that she led a mass protest at Fox HQ in New York today.

Here are the photos of the mass protest in front of News Corp’s offices:

500x_orlypen

Umm, maybe if we did a close up:

500x_orly2

Of course, this photo amused me:

orly-fox

Orly, you better get used to being behind bars.

H/T: Oh For Goodness Sake

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

7 Responses to “Orly Taitz And The Great Fox News Protest Of 2009”

  1. r says:

    Somebody please punch Manning in the face for me

  2. [...] dismissal of birthers as crazy that she led a mass protest at Fox HQ in New York today. Here are the photos of the mass protest in front of News Corps offices. Below The Beltway Blog Archive Orly [...]

  3. kate029 says:

    Look at that middle photo I crack up every time I see her flirting with the man with the camera. What a whore…

  4. Michelle says:

    The Constitution of the United States of America
    “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
    Ineligible due to father. Kenyan student-never a citizen of the United States. You either fulfill the requirements or you don’t-Obama cannot.

  5. Cymraeg says:

    Michelle

    You are completely wrong.

    Here is what the Supreme Court says about “natrual born citizen”

    US v Wong Kim Ark 169 US 649 (1898)

    “The interpretation of the constitution of the United States is necessarily influenced by the fact that its provisions are framed in the language of the English common law, and are to be read in the light of its history.” 124 U.S. 478
    All persons born in the allegiance of the king are natural- born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens. Birth and allegiance go together. Such is the rule of the common law, and it is the common law of this country, as well as of England.
    The (14th) amendment, in clear words and in manifest intent, includes the children born within the territory of the United States of all other persons, of whatever race or color, domiciled within the United States. Every citizen or subject of another country, while domiciled here, is within the allegiance and the protection, and consequently subject to the jurisdiction, of the United States. His allegiance to the United States is direct and immediate, and, although but local and temporary, continuing only so long as he remains within our territory, is yet, in the words of Lord Coke in Calvin’s Case, 7 Coke, 6a, ’strong enough to make a natural subject, for, if he hath issue here, that issue is a natural-born subject-”

  6. [...] as a “long legged mack daddy” and who joined Birther Queen Bee Orly Taitz last year at a protest that nobody attended against Fox News for “covering up” the birther story. Root hasn’t said anything [...]

  7. [...] as a “long legged mack daddy” and who joined Birther Queen Bee Orly Taitz last year at a protest that nobody attended against Fox News for “covering up” the birther story. Root hasn’t said anything [...]

[Below The Beltway is proudly powered by WordPress.]