Comments on: The Slaughter House Rules

By: Below The Beltway » Blog Archive » Why The Slaughter Solution Will Probably Be Allowed To Stand

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:51:37 +0000

[...] what seem to be some fairly clear Constitutional objections, there’s is a very good chance that the House of [...]

By: I AM A WINNER? — PART 7 « Citizen Tom

I AM A WINNER? — PART 7 « Citizen Tom — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:05:13 +0000

[...] The Beltway makes an emphatic statement that The Slaughter House Rules would be unconstitutional. I cannot see how this could possibly be Constitutional given the [...]

By: Asar

Asar — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:49:33 +0000

[...] wonder they want to use parliamentafy tricks to pretend they passed tne Senate bill wi6hout even voting on [...];

By: Below The Beltway » Blog Archive » “No” Votes Piling Up In The House

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:57:42 +0000

[...] wonder they want to use parliamentary tricks to pretend they passed the Senate bill without even voting on [...]

By: James Young

James Young — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:45:38 +0000

“I doubt something as pesky as the Constitution matters to them.”

Doubt? Hasn’t, for at least eighty years, ‘far as I can tell.

Then again, there are quite a few Republicans for whom it doesn’t make any difference, either. Fewer, but some, nonetheless.