Below The Beltway

I believe in the free speech that liberals used to believe in, the economic freedom that conservatives used to believe in, and the personal freedom that America used to believe in.

Four Years Early, Social Security Slips Into The Red

by @ 11:13 am on March 25, 2010. Filed under Barack Obama, George W Bush, Politicos & Pundits, Politics

And so, it begins:

The bursting of the real estate bubble and the ensuing recession have hurt jobs, home prices and now Social Security.

This year, the system will pay out more in benefits than it receives in payroll taxes, an important threshold it was not expected to cross until at least 2016, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Stephen C. Goss, chief actuary of the Social Security Administration, said that while the Congressional projection would probably be borne out, the change would have no effect on benefits in 2010 and retirees would keep receiving their checks as usual.

The problem, he said, is that payments have risen more than expected during the downturn, because jobs disappeared and people applied for benefits sooner than they had planned. At the same time, the program’s revenue has fallen sharply, because there are fewer paychecks to tax.

Analysts have long tried to predict the year when Social Security would pay out more than it took in because they view it as a tipping point — the first step of a long, slow march to insolvency, unless Congress strengthens the program’s finances.

“When the level of the trust fund gets to zero, you have to cut benefits,” Alan Greenspan, architect of the plan to rescue the Social Security program the last time it got into trouble, in the early 1980s, said on Wednesday.

That episode was more dire because the fund could have fallen to zero in a matter of months. But partly because of steps taken in those years, and partly because of many years of robust economic growth, the latest projections show the program will not exhaust its funds until about 2037.

Still, Mr. Greenspan, who later became chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, said: “I think very much the same issue exists today. Because of the size of the contraction in economic activity, unless we get an immediate and sharp recovery, the revenues of the trust fund will be tracking lower for a number of years.”

We’ve known this was coming for a very long time, and Congress deliberately choose to do nothing about it. In fact, the last time someone made an effort to reform Social Security, the Democrats cheered the fact that it failed to gain approval in Congress:

Social Security reform was one of the few things President Bush did, or to put it more accurately, tried to do, that I supported. The fact that those Democrats were cheering the fact that they defeated the plan demonstrates that they are as morally bankrupt as the Republicans they denounce.

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

2 Responses to “Four Years Early, Social Security Slips Into The Red”

  1. tfr says:

    Are they still using that “trust fund” nonsense?
    Current receipts that don’t go to bridges to nowhere, or whatever, go directly to recipients. This is called a “Ponzi scheme”.

  2. Let's Be Free says:

    The horror of this is that it is happening in the very same year that the first baby boomers are turning age 65. Massive withdrawals are forthcoming to serve the boomers. Positive net contributions are necessary for many years to come. Failing to understand the implications of the proceeds of their payments into the system having never invested, the baby boomers also don’t realize that it isn’t their kids who will be the first to not get what was promised from social security. It will be the boomers themselves.

[Below The Beltway is proudly powered by WordPress.]